Fitbit Alta vs Polar M400
Other comparison
Basic Info |
Price range | | |
Best price | See price | See price |
Release date | 2016 | 2014 |
|
|
General Features |
Calories/day | | |
Cycling | | |
Distance meter | | |
Heart rate | | |
Oxygen | | |
Sleep time | | |
Step count | | |
Swimming | | |
Compatibility |
Android | | |
iOS | | |
Windows Phone | | |
Mac | | |
Windows | | |
|
|
Functions & Connectivity |
Audio speaker | | |
Clock | | |
Phone | | |
Vibration | | |
Bluetooth | | |
Cellular chip | | |
GPS | | |
NFC | | |
WIFI | | |
Battery & Features |
Battery life | 5 days | 1 day |
Accelerometer | | |
Barometer | | |
Water resistance | | |
Phone notifications | | |
Email notifications | | |
Text notifications | | |
More information or buy on amazon: |
| See price | See price |
Comparison of Fitbit Alta vs Polar M400
The Fitbit Alta is in the low-price range whereas the Polar M400 is in the medium-price range and the Fitbit Alta was released in 2016; the Polar M400 arrived in the market in 2014.
Both trackers measure the calories you burn every day.The Polar M400 is made for cycling but the Fitbit Alta is not, and both watches measure the distance you run or walk, and the Polar M400 can measure your heart rate.
In addition, both watches track the quality of your sleep, and both trackers count the steps. The two fitness trackers have a clock integrated, the two fitness trackers can be connected via bluetooth, The Polar M400 has an integrated GPS but the Fitbit Alta has none, and finally the Fitbit Alta has a battery life of 5 days and the Fitbit Alta has 5 days .